2010/10/7 Stewart, Robert <Robert.Stewart@sig.com>
My suggestion was to make "ct" a prefix akin to "static_" in static_cast and static_assert. I do like the parallel with "rt," so I would prefer these:
ct_bounded<int>
rt_bounded<short>
I second the suggestion for "ct" in favour of "static" for two reasons: it is shorter, and static has its other meaning. Those have the advantage of being readable in English: "compile time bounded
int" and "runtime bounded short." With familiarity, I imagine that "compile time" and "runtime" would be reduced to "see tee" and "arr tee."
I prefere sufexes, becaluse then the part of the name, that brings most information comes first: bounded_ct<int> x; // bounded at compile time of type int bounded<int> x; // bounded (at run time) of type int Regards Kris