30 May
2007
30 May
'07
2:09 p.m.
"Gottlob Frege" <gottlobfrege@gmail.com> wrote in news:97ffb310705300624j611e0c54j56b256a127922268@mail.gmail.com:
On 5/30/07, Oliver.Kowalke@qimonda.com <Oliver.Kowalke@qimonda.com> wrote:
Hello, some function definitions are missing the inline keyword (sha1.hpp and uuid.hpp). uuid::is_null() will no be renamed to uuid::is_nil() (ask in order to be conform to UUID-RFC)? Oliver
Personally, I'd stick to null over nil, as null is more the C++ standard (ie see the new 'null_ptr' that will probably be added to the next standard).
I also perfer null, but I am happy to use what this list decides on. Maybe both?
Tony _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Andy.