[boost] Re: BOOST_TRY like macros: time to add them?

Guillaume Melquiond <guillaume.melquiond@ens-lyon.fr> writes: | With this new definition of the macros, it seems to me you can't use | multiple catch (a handler sequence). But I don't see any way to define | the macros such that BOOST_TRY {} BOOST_CATCH(_) {} BOOST_CATCH(_) {} | works as expected. Adding a BOOST_TRY_END would solve the problem. But | maybe someone can find a better solution without adding any macro. Would something that resulted in: if (true) { } else if (false) { } else if (false) { } work? try { } catch () { } catch () { } -- Lgb