[boost] Re: ublas / cw 8.3

Michael Stevens wrote:

It used to give a lot of nasty template errors of the form: # 678: :, value_type> (), cm, e, row_major_tag ()); # Error: ^ # illegal template argument dependent expression

I say 'used to' because the results are now hidden behind the grey 'n/a'. I doubt there is much that can be done however. If you have better information and the compiler we could take a look!

Unfortunately, I don't have the compiler. Maybe somebody who runs the regressions for it could have a look into bjam.log. I was just wondering what it could be that makes cw 8.3 fail (and not vc 6, for example). Stefan