5 Apr
2011
5 Apr
'11
2:11 a.m.
From Vicente BOTET, on Mon 4/4/2011 5:59 PM:
I think that it is better to improve my library that is there to manage with any conversion, and let lexical cast do what it did originally.
Let me know what do you think.
It didn't sound like he change the behavior of lexical_cast<>(), at all. I am very much in favor of these optimizations going in, since I have a large amount of code which uses lexical_cast<>(). I really don't see what this has to do with your library. IMO, if its existence hinges on some fairly straight-forward optimizations going into lexical_cast<>(), that should raise some serious questions. Matt