3 Mar
2005
3 Mar
'05
9:39 p.m.
Interesting, I guess I hadn't thought of writing something like "abc|" simple as (?:abc)? Thanks Mike "John Maddock" <john@johnmaddock.co.uk> wrote in message news:05c001c515dd$8b7232c0$3ef20352@fuji...
"(?:)|abc" and "^$|abc" seem to get around this deficiency, but I am wondering why it is there in the first place.
Remember also that:
|x is the same as x??
x| is the same as x?
John. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost