Peter Dimov wrote:
Markus Schöpflin wrote:
Sigh, obviously I don't manage to create a small reproducer for the error seen at http://preview.tinyurl.com/23towf. (Scroll down to the last five errors, ignore the rest, this has been fixed by now.)
Can you please try changing
intrusive_ptr_add_ref( detail::get_pointer( m_ptr ) );
to
T * p = detail::get_pointer( m_ptr ); intrusive_ptr_add_ref( p );
?
It could be the intermediate get_pointer call that is tricking the compiler into thinking that the call is not dependent.
I modified the constructor into: intrusive_ptr(const pointer &p, bool add_ref = true): m_ptr(p) { if(m_ptr != 0 && add_ref) { T* p = detail::get_pointer(m_ptr); intrusive_ptr_add_ref(p); } } But I still get: cxx: Error: ../../../boost/interprocess/smart_ptr/intrusive_ptr.hpp, line 77: identifier "intrusive_ptr_add_ref" is undefined (undeclared) detected during instantiation of "boost::interprocess::intrusive_ptr<T, VoidPointer>::intrusive_ptr(const boost::interprocess::intrusive_ptr<T, VoidPointer>::pointer &, bool) [with T=n_transitive::X, VoidPointer=VP]" at line 468 of "intrusive_ptr_test.cpp" intrusive_ptr_add_ref(p); --------^ Markus