Re: [boost] [function types][review]

Hi Dave, thanks already for your use case description (it would've been the next thing for me to ask for). I'll get back to this in more detail, later. Just a quick note to ensure we understand each other correctly: David Abrahams wrote:

Tobias Schwinger <tschwinger@neoscientists.org> writes:

...

Dave's point is (I hope I summarize this accurately, please correct me if not) to put the class type into the sequence of parameters adding (cv-qualifications - but we all agree on this

I must've missed when that happened

"we all agree on this" refers to cv-qualifying the class type, here. Regards, Tobias