Re: [boost] 32/64 library name conflict under Windows?

On 8 March 2016 at 11:45, Paul A. Bristow wrote:

KISS (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KISS_principle is *my* default position).

So I favour option A.

I agree. I've been annoyed by this issue for years (because tools like Cmake can't automatically find which version to link because Boost doesn't give a default logic to find which arch are these binaries). Last time there was a discussion, most people agreed something should be done but there was no concensus on what to do exactly (nor was there a specific proposal). Joël Lamotte