29 Dec
2008
29 Dec
'08
7:36 p.m.
David Abrahams wrote:
on Sun Dec 28 2008, Howard Hinnant <hinnant-AT-twcny.rr.com> wrote:
Because language supported EMO isn't a realistic possibility in C++0X but allowing (not requiring) EMO emulation in tuple is a realistic possibility (N2800 arguably already allows the latter).
</practical>
That being said, if you can get an easier to use solution into C++0X, then you're the man! :-)
"Even I" can't slip that feature in without anyone noticing at this late date.
I think we should care about C compatibility. If C does not allow EMO, then I would suggest using struct/class keywords to make struct C compatible whereas "class" could implement EMO and other future features. Regards, Ion