On 12/6/22 12:37 PM, Andrey Semashev via Boost wrote:
On 12/6/22 21:58, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:
Rainer Deyke wrote:
A more neutral approach would be to give each library a range of C++ standards for which the library is useful, and allow the user to filter by the C++ standard they are using. Picking C++11, for example, would filter out both Atomic (because it is superseded by the standard library) and Describe (because it requires C++14).
That's not correct because parts of Atomic are only superseded by the C++20 standard library, not the C++11 one.
And some features are not in any standard so far.
Wouldn't all this discussion be irrelevant if Boost was distributed only as source code and not pre-compiled libraries? Robert Ramey
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost