-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 04/21/2010 02:30 AM, Jeffrey Hellrung wrote:
I'm obviously missing some key concept, because very little of that parses. I don't know of any efficient way to determine what that concept might be, so here are some possibly-nonsensical questions to try to scare it into view: [...]
If you look at the definition of the move-enabling macros, you'll see that a move-enabled class (under C++03) has the following member functions:
Thanks for the explanation. I think I see it now.
Let me rephrase the question. The current Boost.Move library has been discussed on this list since at least January of 2009, and it's still not approved. So how can I adopt anything regarding boost::rv if the library that defines boost::rv might still not be available if/when my library is ready for inclusion into a Boost release? Would I have to bundle move.hpp with XInt in that case? Or yank out the move stuff completely?
I guess you have a couple options. [...]
By the sound of it, it will probably be approved before XInt makes it to review. So it may not be a problem, but again, thanks for the information. - -- Chad Nelson Oak Circle Software, Inc. * * * -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkvPBtoACgkQp9x9jeZ9/wQvcQCfWpldrf7Gc/sWvnhICDmQhWt+ 4D0An2ybPGPHJhor2q84HfbbeO6BuY8R =UtKW -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----