Joel, Joel Young wrote:
Alejandro Cabrera <cpp.cabrera <at> gmail.com> writes:
My apologies regarding the statement on Boost Serialization. I thought that it wasn't actively maintained.
No problem.
Out of curiosity, have you seen the NPS Bloom filter package linked to here:
Joel
I had not heard of it before. I've also been informed of the existence of this alternate Bloom filter library: http://tech.blog.greplin.com/lucene-utilities-and-bloom-filters Mailing list, There are definitely many alternatives out there. I'll be writing benchmarks during the next week testing collision rates, insertion speed, and query speed for the following types: integer, string, user-defined (URL class saving URL as a string). Are there any other metrics the community is interested in? Are there any specific types of data that you'd like to see tested? -Alej -- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/GSoC-Request-for-Feedback-on-Boost-Bloom-... Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.