23 Oct
2009
23 Oct
'09
3:57 p.m.
Olaf van der Spek wrote:
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Stewart, Robert <Robert.Stewart@sig.com> wrote:
I very rarely tab-complete header file names, and I suspect most users Your usage patterns are limited to your coworkers and your environment. Mine suggests that there are a great many people who use tab completion constantly. Consequently, we can't favor one over the other if a neutral solution is possible.
As a Boost dev or as a user? As user the version without /all seems better.
This user would prefer the lib/all.hpp, so that when compile times get egregious I can quickly track down the overzealous */all.hpp's and replace them with the minimal includes. Jeff