31 Jan
2013
31 Jan
'13
3:38 p.m.
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 3:37 AM, Dave Abrahams <dave@boostpro.com> wrote:
On the other hand we have destructive move-semantics,
In what sense are you claiming that we "have" destructive move-semantics? Nobody has ever implemented or even fully-specified destructive move semantics AFAIK. Destructive move semantics are (at this time) nothing more than a fantasy some people have about what they think would be a better world.
It's a figure of speech. I wasn't saying we actually "have" them - I was defining a term and making a distinction. You omitted the rest of the sentence. -- Paul Smith