Re: [boost] Boost.Fiber review January 6-15

Le 23/01/14 01:34, Nat Goodspeed a écrit :

On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:

...

Le 22/01/14 17:07, Nat Goodspeed a écrit :

...

Moreover (a key point) anyone invoking the Fiber API who is constrained to C++03 features will not have movable-only types. In that scenario, fiber(bind(callable, arg1, arg2)) *is* completely equivalent to fiber(callable, arg1, arg2). I disagree. We have Boost/Move. Hmm, okay.

...

...

So when discussing the requested variadic fiber constructor, I will tease apart the C++11 and C++03 cases. I feel pretty comfortable stating that the former is much more important than the latter. Agreed, but at least the C++03 must support movables types. On seeing your response above, my impulse is to think you mean: "at least with a C++11 compiler, the fiber constructor must support movable types." Please clarify?

If in fact you mean C++03, may we interpret that as: "if the Fiber library provides a C++03-compatible variadic fiber constructor, that constructor must support movable types" ?

I meant these constructor template <class F> fiber figer(BOOST_FWD_REF(F) f, BOOST_FWD_REF(A1) p1); Vicente