Stewart, Robert wrote:
Edward Diener wrote:
On 7/10/2011 7:59 PM, Lorenzo Caminiti wrote:
Review of Boost.TTI 2011-07-10 (Lorenzo Caminiti)
10. [NOTE] I think "member variable" is a more accepted name that "member data"-- isn't it? If so, I'd rename MEMBER_DATA to MEMBER_VARIABLE.
I can understand your preference. I will consider it.
They are called data members, not member variables, in C++. Names like "member variable" come from other languages.
I don't use "member data" generally, but to me it describes data members collectively, not singularly.
I recognize the desire to keep the prefixes alike, but I'd rather see "HAS_DATA_MEMBER" to be consistent with Standard terminology.
+1. Following the standard terminology will avoid confusion. Best, Vicente -- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/TTI-Review-tp3658414p3661449.html Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.