9 Jan
2006
9 Jan
'06
9:59 a.m.
Vladimir Prus wrote:
Not that I care about 2.95 either, but I think the reasoning in this thread is a bit faulty. Developers just say "it's too old and non-conforming". But who knows what's used in practice, especially outside of bleeding-edge Linux distros?
Even conservative distributions like Debian use gcc 3 now. If a Linux (or any other OS) distribution still uses gcc 2 then it is unlikely the distribution wants to support modern versions of Boost, anyway (if it supports Boost at all). Regards, m Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com