-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 10 February 2009 15:05 pm, Vicente Botet wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: "Frank Mori Hess" <frank.hess@nist.gov> To: <boost@lists.boost.org> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 3:33 PM Subject: Re: [boost] Gauging interest in a thread-safe containers library
I guess what I'd like to see in boost would be something like a boost::monitor<T> which would be like a boost::optional<T> plus monitor functionality, and maybe a boost::monitor_ptr<T> which would be a boost::shared_ptr<boost::monitor<T> > with some syntactic sugar.
Hi, I know that you have already a monitor class in your Poet library. Why don't you propose Poet for inclusion in Boost? What about a review request?
I would like to rewrite poet::monitor to be more like boost::optional, instead of the current implementation which was built on top of poet::monitor_ptr, mostly for historical reasons (it was convenient at the time). However, I don't know when (or even if) I'll get around to actually doing that. Anyone is welcome to use whatever parts of the libpoet interface or code they like and incorporate it into their own submission though. I wouldn't mind at all. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFJkzil5vihyNWuA4URAp/xAJ0cmY2Yjz7Tej/w9S+W61xa8PrTyQCeNwMR zejLAuYVC5uvicaNm286CrM= =7p0z -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----