Sergey Voropaev wrote:
Robert Ramey <ramey <at> rrsd.com> writes:
Correct on all points. I am aware of the track item. I believe that I've addressed it at least in some cases. Unfortunately I've been bogged down in other stuff.
I would recommend that uses not use binary archives with 1.42 and 1.43.
What is wrong with 1.43? I had tested part of our projects with boost 1.43 and I had not found any problem. But tests were preliminary and not complete. What possible problems will be in serialization 1.43 version?
Actually that may work. The problem only manifests itself when one reads a binary archive created with 1.42 (and I believe 1.43) and read with 1.44. I did not use 1.42 version.
My plan now is to upgrade our projects to 1.43 and stabilize system. Or it is better to wait 1.44.1 or something like? What are your recommendations?
I recommend using 1.44 if one is going to use binary_archives
What about time scale?
I believe that 1.44 is already released (www.boost.org)
About "six" version number problem. As I believe, in 1.43 there are not problems with "six" version. Binary file has "7" version number in 1.43.
And this fix-six changes the version # of 1.42 files to 7 from 6. Robert Ramey
Sergey Voropaev
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost