John Phillips wrote:
Sorry for miss-naming and calling the Math Toolkit by the incorrect MathTools,
No worries :-)
but the basis for my concern that they will be merged is from the review announcement, where John Maddock says:
The intention (at least on my part) is to merge the implementations so that we don't end up with two different versions(!), and so that we get the best of both worlds: the genericity of the current Boost.Math version (works to a degree with numbers represented as class types), and the performance of Johan's version for the builtin floating point types. How the library and documentation should be structured is a whole other issue - thanks for raising this - I think you're correct that these utilities should be easy to find and at the very least flagged up on the library index page. I'm open to suggestions as to whether that means separate documentation and organisation, or just a separate index entry leading to the sub-TOC for fpclassify etc. There are pro's and cons either way, so I'm easy I guess. John.