12 Dec
2011
12 Dec
'11
2:02 p.m.
Daryle Walker wrote
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 12:55:33 +0000 From: dnljms@
On 12 December 2011 12:46, Daryle Walker <darylew@> wrote:
Should we add preprocessor stuff to conditionally use the C++11 "enum
class" construct?
We have something like that already:
Reading it, it doesn't have any base type and/or forward-declaration facilities.
How do you want to be able to use forward declaration in a portable way? There are also scoped enums with underlying type that are no enum class. These could be added as well. Vicente -- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Add-macros-for-the-enum-class-concept-tp4... Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.