20 May
2025
20 May
'25
9:18 a.m.
On Sun, 18 May 2025 at 19:57, Jean-Louis Leroy via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
I thought the ML would add [boost] at the beginning of the subject, but no...sorry for that. I am leaving the entire post as a quote below for the benefit of those who may have missed it because they have filters on [boost].
Steven found the name `vectored_error_handler` confusing. What about `indirect_error_handler` or `function_error_handler`?
function_error_handler looks good to me. default_error_handler or maybe just error_handler (although I think the name might already be taken by the base policy) could also be reasonable. vectored_error_handler seems confusing to me. Regards, Ruben.