Re: [boost] virtual function templates

On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 6:09 AM, <strasser@uni-bremen.de> wrote:

Hi,

is there interest in a boost utility to implement (pseudo-) virtual function templates?

I've been looking for a way to implement virtual-functions for cases where the objects in question are stored within shared memory region, thus presenting the challenge that the overridden function addresses might be different for different processes. Would that be accommodated by your approach, or are you in fact storing pointers to functions on the base type?