Jonathan Turkanis wrote:
"Daniel Wallin" <dalwan01@student.umu.se> wrote in message news:40378F47.4090105@student.umu.se...
Douglas Gregor wrote:
On Saturday 21 February 2004 04:59 am, Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
We can (re-)consider 'boost::meta':
meta::if_<...> meta::find<> meta::vector<> meta::set<> meta::map<> ...
Doesn't look bad at all, actually.
I'm a big fan of using "meta" instead of "mpl".
FWIW, I'm not. I type it often enough to be bothered by the completely unnecessary extra character.
I like "meta"..
If you're bothered by the extra character, how about just "mp"? After all, if it's part of boost, of course it must be a "library". On second though, it must involve "programming", too, so why not just "m"?
Because it's too generic. mpl is sufficiently unique and restricts the library domain enough. -- Daniel Wallin