Re: [boost] [fusion][map] default construction semantics

Rutger ter Borg wrote:

Please see attached an example of constructing a fusion map, of which I would expect to give identical results.

Really?

// OK map_type map();

This looks like a function declaration to me (a function with name "map" that takes no arguments and returns a map_type), but C++ might be intelligent enough to see that it is a default initialization.

// Compiler error -- tries to copy map_type map;

This looks like a default initialization to me. I have no idea, whether this default initialization should compile without error. Regards, Thomas