On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 00:11, Stefan Strasser <strasser@uni-bremen.de> wrote:
Am Monday 30 November 2009 23:42:34 schrieb Zachary Turner:
You could put them in the global namespace? I think that would conform better to the letter of the rules, without really being any safer in practice.
I'd rather put them in a library specific namespace in that case, and require the programmer to put a using declaration in the translation unit.
precedent: std::rel_ops _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
This reminds me of the repr() function in Python, http://docs.python.org/library/functions.html#repr. Maybe Boost.Represent would make sense as name for the project, as it shows a representation of the data. Jeroen Habraken