On Tue, Dec 6, 2022 at 2:45 PM Robert Ramey via Boost
On 12/6/22 12:37 PM, Andrey Semashev via Boost wrote:
On 12/6/22 21:58, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:
Rainer Deyke wrote:
A more neutral approach would be to give each library a range of C++ standards for which the library is useful, and allow the user to filter by the C++ standard they are using. Picking C++11, for example, would filter out both Atomic (because it is superseded by the standard library) and Describe (because it requires C++14).
That's not correct because parts of Atomic are only superseded by the C++20 standard library, not the C++11 one.
And some features are not in any standard so far.
Wouldn't all this discussion be irrelevant if Boost was distributed only as source code and not pre-compiled libraries?
No. And no one, except you, has mentioned binaries. The entire discussion has only been about source. -- -- René Ferdinand Rivera Morell -- Don't Assume Anything -- No Supone Nada -- Robot Dreams - http://robot-dreams.net