Re: [boost] [binary-int] pre-release available

"Scott Schurr" wrote:

On a different note, Matt Calabrese lofted a preprocessor-based library:

BOOST_BINARY_LITERAL( 101 0111 1010 0110 )

This looks way cool. I personally like the way the '::value' is not required.

So, how does the boost community decide which of the proposals (template-based or preprocessor-based) to pursue?

During review reviewers tell their opinion. /Pavel