17 May
2007
17 May
'07
10:45 a.m.
On 5/16/07, David Abrahams <dave@boost-consulting.com> wrote:
on Wed May 16 2007, "Dean Michael Berris" <dmberris-AT-friendster.com> wrote:
Might make sense, if the intention was to make CMake a viable option (and not replacement) for Boost.Build in the first few Boost releases.
The intention is to make it a replacement, or there's little point.
Now the question is when CMake is used as a replacement, do we want that immediately in the next release? Or would it be something that could wait over a couple of releases gradually phasing out BBv2? -- Dean Michael C. Berris http://cplusplus-soup.blogspot.com/ mikhailberis AT gmail DOT com +63 928 7291459