----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul A. Bristow" <pbristow@hetp.u-net.com> To: <boost@lists.boost.org> Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 7:00 PM Subject: Re: [boost] [Review] FormalReview ofProposed Boost.ChronoLibrary Starts TOMORROW
-----Original Message----- From: boost-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of vicente.botet Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 5:25 PM To: boost@lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [boost] [Review] Formal Review ofProposed Boost.ChronoLibrary Starts TOMORROW
I have now...
#define BOOST_SYSTEM_INLINED #define BOOST_CHRONO_INLINED
#include <boost/chrono/process_times.hpp> #include <cmath>
produces the same output :-(
I am including boost/trunk and boost/sandbox/chrono
/Zi /nologo /W3 /WX- /Od /Oy- /D "WIN32" /D "_DEBUG" /D "_CONSOLE" /D "_UNICODE" /D "UNICODE" /GF- /Gm /EHsc /RTC1 /GS /fp:precise /Za /Zc:wchar_t /Zc:forScope /Fp"Debug\chrono_runtime.pch" /Fa"Debug\" /Fo"Debug\" /Fd"Debug\vc100.pdb" /Gd /analyze- /errorReport:queue
Perhaps I need to build the library? Hopefully it won't hurt too much ;-)
Have you replaced the Boost.System directory?
I've just updated the boost/sandbox/chrono/ directory.
It has a system folder
Do I have to do something else?
Not that I know.
(I assumed - the mother of all foul-ups - that putting sandbox first in include order would find any new version).
This seems a good assumption. I have not tested with this schema recently, I use to test on a single boost tree. Sorry, but I'm out of ideas for the moment. Best, Vicente