On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Hartmut Kaiser <hartmut.kaiser@gmail.com> wrote:
Can you please clarify your statement? Which "plan" is not to succeed by preventing Boost.Local from being accepted?
I was referring to the 'plan' of the OP to use Boost.Local for a year or so and to switch to C++11 lambdas afterwards.
Thank you for the clarification. On this point, I would expect to use the C++11 algorithms that are part of Boost.Algorithm for the same time duration (1 year or so for OP, probably more 3 years for me :( ) while I still have to use C++03 compilers: all_of, any_of, none_of + the upcoming algs below: On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 12:56 AM, Marshall Clow <mclow.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
I've implemented several of the new features of the C++11 standard library for the upcoming Boost.Algorithm library. I will be putting them up for comment as soon as the library review is finished. [ Examples: copy_if, find_if_not, iota, is_partition, partition_point, and so on ]
For example "I plan to use boost::all_of for 1 year and to switch to std::all_of after that when my C++11 compiler becomes available". In your opinion, is this plan a problem or not for Boost.Algorithm? Thanks. --Lorenzo