Gennaro Prota wrote:
On Thu, 6 Jul 2006 13:29:58 +0300, "Peter Dimov" <pdimov@mmltd.net> wrote:
Gennaro Prota wrote:
#define BOOST_ASSERT(expr) \ ( \ (void)sizeof boost::detail::assert_ \ ::valid_assert_expression(expr) \ , assert(expr) \ ) /**/
Sorry, I thought you had read my earlier post about this. I found some invocations of BOOST_ASSERT which don't use an expression with int type. When BOOST_ASSERT falls back to the standard assert macro it may work or not, depending on what the underlying C library does.
I know. Is this a real problem? Are you sure that making BOOST_ASSERT fail when assert works a good idea? It will just encourage people to not use it. Not that they need much encouragement. Almost everyone ignores BOOST_ASSERT (and the users' requests to please not do so).