13 Oct
2012
13 Oct
'12
12:13 p.m.
Le 13/10/12 13:52, Andrey Semashev a écrit :
On Oct 13, 2012 1:19 PM, "Rob Stewart" <robertstewart@comcast.net> wrote:
Fair enough. Perhaps, we could absract away Boost.Thread from both libraries? Seems like a logical solution for a case like this. This seems like a nice idea, but isn't the reason for the switch to Chrono C++11 compatibility?
This is probably true. However, AFAIK Boost.Thread does not work with std::chrono.
You are right, and I don't have a solution now. Maybe C++11 template aliases could help in this concern. Best, Vicente