Hi, I have used both rapidxml and pugixml (which inspired rapidxml) http://code.google.com/p/pugixml/ and they are the best c++ xml libs I found (if you don't need an xml validating parser). RapidXML will be supported or is supported by the boost property-tree library but that does not mean it can be included without a review. It would be great if the authors can put forward one of the libraries (or a combined one) for a Boost review. It would be a great addition ! regards jose On Jan 9, 2008 2:28 PM, Stefano Delli Ponti <stefano.delliponti@gmail.com> wrote:
Phil Endecott wrote:
Barco You wrote:
There are xerces and miniXML ... I think it's the real reason not to do so much redundance. :)
There's also RapidXML by Marcin Kalicinski (Boost license), which I wasn't aware of when Stefan presented his libxml2-based library:
http://rapidxml.sourceforge.net/ http://rapidxml.sourceforge.net/manual.html
By the way, it seems that RapidXML will be included, without much fanfare, in the upcoming 1.35, as a detail of the property-tree library. Is this correct?
Sted
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost