23 Nov
2004
23 Nov
'04
7:50 p.m.
Beman Dawes <bdawes@acm.org> writes:
At 03:33 AM 11/23/2004, Daniel Wallin wrote:
Is there a way for the user of the library to enforce a rule like "No positional param after named params" on a case by case basis?
I think we could implement something like that. I have to think about it a little.
It may be confusing to users if different uses of the library follow different rules. Is there a serious need for anything other than the conservative "No positional param after named params" rule? (That's the rule I'm used to.)
I have the same reaction (and question). -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com