[boost] Re: [ptr_container] indirect_fun - do we still need it?

"Thorsten Ottosen" <nesotto@cs.auc.dk> wrote in message news:d5qspk$ap3$1@sea.gmane.org...

but I would like to see the stuff being put into a better maintained utility if somebody is volunteering.

boost::utility would be a good place for it, I guess.

I'm not sure what you're trying to achieve. and when is the clone then created?

As I said in private e-mail, that was not good idea and we won't achieve nothing with it. But only if you make ptr_container::operator = (auto_ptr<ptr_container>) works as expected. -- Pavel Chikulaev