whoops, turns out the test does fail. I'll look into it. Note that complaints get better results when posted a track items where they hang around rather than scrolling off the list. Robert Ramey Robert Ramey wrote:
I just compiled and ran this test with no problem on MSVC 7.1
Robert Ramey
troy d. straszheim wrote:
Jarl Lindrud wrote:
There is a rather bizarre bug in Boost.Serialization, that was reported on this list three years ago:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/147010/match=serializati... +bizarre+bug
To sum up, a piece of code that is never even executed, is causing a serialization error in a different part of the program.
Unfortunately it seems that this bug was never fixed - I just tried it on Boost 1.39.0, and the bug is still there.
Any chance something can be done about it?
For reference, here is the sample program that reproduces the issue:
Looks like UB to me. From the C++ standard:
Note: in particular, a null reference cannot exist in a well-defined program, because the only way to create such a reference would be to bind it to the "object" obtained by dereferencing a null pointer, which causes undefined behavior. (§ 8.3.2, ¶ 4)
There is plenty of stuff out on the net about this; I find this thread pretty entertaining:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1110111/what-part-of-dereferencing-null-p...
-t _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost