15 Jun
2006
15 Jun
'06
6:14 p.m.
David Abrahams wrote:
a. I don't think you're actually agreeing with me. Maybe s/carefully/seriously/?
b. Normally our default is not the same as the compiler's default when the compiler's default is nonconformant, as it is in this case.
I missed (well forgot actually) that the compiler was non-comforming in that mode, I guess it's not quite non-conforming enough to cause problems for most people, although I agree that the performance issue is a very real one. The suggestion to provide a Boost.Build option for this sounds like the best approach though? Anyone want to provide a patch? John.