6 Apr
2010
6 Apr
'10
7:52 a.m.
On 5 April 2010 22:59, Eric Niebler <eric@boostpro.com> wrote:
I suspect the real problem is in a buggy implementation of decltype on msvc-10. For the upcoming boost release, I suggest that we stick with the non-decltype implementation of result_of on msvc-10, or risk massively breaking users' code, not to mention proto, spirit and xpressive on that compiler.
I think this is my fault. I was updating the use of config macros, which caused it to use decltype for Visual C++ 10. For other libraries I submitted tickets but since no one seemed to be maintaining result_of I made that change myself. I'll revert it for now but we should probably change config to define BOOST_NO_DECLTYPE for Visual C++ 10 if it's buggy on that compiler. Daniel