1 May
2012
1 May
'12
1:36 p.m.
On 1 May 2012 12:08, Olaf van der Spek <ml@vdspek.org> wrote:
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Daniel James <dnljms@gmail.com> wrote:
Maybe, I'm not expert enough to say for sure. 'broken' is quite a harsh way to describe it. I think Microsoft tends to prioritize supporting existing code over strict standards compliance (which is perhaps one of the reasons they've been so successful in the business world).
True, I meant broken as in not accepting the code I posted. Is there any way to make it work with both GCC and VC (while using hash_value)?
AFAIK only by controlling the source order, which is pretty flimsy. The customization mechanism isn't great for a namespace you don't own.