31 Dec
2008
31 Dec
'08
9:45 a.m.
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 10:42:43 +0100, Arno Schödl <aschoedl@think-cell.com> wrote:
I think c) is the least-bad option. Any more ideas/opinions?
Agree. You can make it look like it's in boost:: with a using-directive. ^^^^^^^^^
Do you mean
namespace boost {
using ::boost_partition_algorithms_adl_barrier::lower_bound; using ::boost_partition_algorithms_adl_barrier::upper_bound; using ::boost_partition_algorithms_adl_barrier::binary_search; using ::boost_partition_algorithms_adl_barrier::equal_range;
} // namespace boost
Those are using-declarations. Different beast. -- David Abrahams Boostpro Computing http://www.boostpro.com