Re: [boost] [Boost.Test] should we add operator<<() for standardcontainers etc

Thorsten Ottosen <thorsten.ottosen <at> dezide.com> writes:

then why not add

BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL_RANGE( Rng1, Rng2 )

// implement by calling make_iterator_range() on the two arguments

Also, I would like to see

BOOST_CHECK_NE_RANGE( Rng1, Rng2 ) BOOST_CHECK_GT_RANGE( Rng1, Rng2 ) BOOST_CHECK_GE_RANGE( Rng1, Rng2 ) BOOST_CHECK_LT_RANGE( Rng1, Rng2 ) BOOST_CHECK_LE_RANGE( Rng1, Rng2 )

I guess it make sence now. The only problem I would prefer to avoid extra dependency on range library. I can put it into separate header. Gennadiy