
26 Jan
2006
26 Jan
'06
2:33 p.m.
Thomas Witt <witt@acm.org> writes:
AlisdairM wrote:
Thomas Witt wrote:
At the least, I think the build maintainers and regression testers need to make a decision on this fast if we are heading back into release mode: Will Boost 1.34 be based on boost build v1 or boost build v2?
If v2 is up and running in two weeks it can make it in. My personal opinion is that this is a recipe for disaster. I would like to push it to 1.35.
Have you seen Vladimir's plan for the transition? It's solid. I think if we can accomplish all the necessary testing of the system within the two week timeframe, the risk of using v2 for the release will be very low. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com