16 Mar
2011
16 Mar
'11
12:24 p.m.
Joel Falcou-3 wrote:
On 16/03/11 13:11, Stewart, Robert wrote:
I generally like the names from Proto. Consistency would be nice, but consider the names as they are likely to be standardized. Better to get the names "right" now. For example, I think "postfix_increment" is a likely name for standardization, while "post_inc" is not.
I guess some typedef could be done so we have a consistent proto list of operator's name.
+1 Vicente -- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Review-Boost-Type-Traits-Extension-by-Fre... Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.