From: vicente.botet
what do you think about replacing the typedef by a specific class so instead of writing bounded<int>::type v; we write bounded<int> v;
I was already thinking about this, but I'm not sure if this is that good idea.
The advantage to have a specific class (see below) is that it allows to add specific members that have a sens, e. g. change_lower_bound can be added to bounded<int, int, int> but not to bounded_int<int, 0, 100>.
OTOH the classes will have members that make no sense in some cases, e.g. change_bounds_inclusion for clipping (assuming it will derive from bounded, otherwise the other useful functions would have to be duplicated in both classes). Therefore I'd rather stick with the current solution to avoid defining six classes with lots of constructors and many identical members... Regards, Robert