On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Robert Ramey <ramey@rrsd.com> wrote: [...]
And of course I'm still smarting from having the BOOST_NO_EXCEPTIONS definition change while I wasn't looking to from what has always been documented in a way that makes some sense to something that I still dont' get.
So I stand behind my suggestions.
Sorry, I've only been glossing over this discussion. Can someone please clarify how BOOST_NO_EXCEPTIONS has changed, what specific change Robert (and possibly others) find troubling, and what practical consequences this has had or presently has? Ditto for boost::throw_exception. (For the record, I've glanced at the blurbs on BOOST_NO_EXCEPTIONS within Boost.Config and Boost.Exception and it's difficult for me to parse what effect their differences have in practice, and it sounds like others have a good idea what the problem seems to be.) - Jeff