31 Oct
2012
31 Oct
'12
4:58 p.m.
On 29-10-2012 11:50, Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
That seems like a lot of nice improvements. However, there is one thing that could save a lot of time for us, and that's the ability to run a specific test as the first one.
Is that hard to add?
Another issue. It would be cool to be able to give access to private members in the unit test. So given BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE( testMyClass ) { ... } I would be able to test private functions with: class MyClass { friend void boost::test::testMyClass(); // or friend class boost::test::access; }; or something. Would this be possible? kind regards -Thorsten