Andy Little wrote:
"Rene Rivera" wrote in message
So I say don't worry about it, and just give users the info and let them use the info.
Its a shame this couldnt use a fuzzy logic approach.
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-fuzzy/
Library X - DOESNT need building Library Y - MAY need building Library Z - POSSIBLY needs building Library E - PARTLY needs building Librarry J n- REALLY needs building Library K - STRONGLY needs building Library W - REALLY STRONGLY needs building Library A - POSSIBLY PARTLY needs building.
Similarly for compilers status.
hmmm I can hear David Abrahams laughing again ...!
I'm laughing... Since I think you just volunteered to write the code that does that :-D -- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - grafikrobot/yahoo