On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Tom Kent <lists@teeks99.com> wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Marshall Clow <mclow.lists@gmail.com>wrote:
Release candidate files for 1.51.0 beta 1 are available at http://boost.cowic.de/rc/
As always, the release managers would appreciate it if you download the candidate of your choice and give building it a try. Please report both success and failure, and anything else that is noteworthy.
This helps ensure the candidates build OK before we push them out to SourceForge.
The files (and associated md5s) are: 543e3498c4ce520bfa635607971be4fc boost_1_51_0_beta1_rc1.tar.gz 3f9beb290dad223c21822e9ef601fd80 boost_1_51_0_beta1_rc1.tar.bz2 0401b9c40aac37b7dd9ef7e33190270c boost_1_51_0_beta1_rc1.zip e5aa1cd82e71173197ee6794c2c035d2 boost_1_51_0_beta1_rc1.7z
Thanks,
--The release managers
Could we change the directory that is packed into the zipped archive to be the same as the archive name? For example, if we have boost_1_51_0_beta1_rc1.tar.gz the directory name should be boost_1_51_0_beta1_rc1 not simply boost_1_51_0_beta1.
The only reason I ask is because my build script expects it...if there's good reasons for making rc's have a different archive name I'm open to it.
Tom Kent
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
My mistake. This was only a problem with the _rc2 files, the _rc1 files are actually how I asked for them. Is this a bug in the build for _rc2? Tom